Back in the early part of the season, Steven Gerrard flirted with the idea of a 3-5-2.
Against Motherwell, Rangers adopted the system. It was in this match that the side really began to show defensive weaknesses.
The Ibrox side shipped three goals, drew the game and as a result Gerrard all but binned the formation. But with a quick glance at the Rangers squad, it could well be the best way to get the most from our attacking outlets.
Borna Barisic has struggled for form back in Scotland but continues to go from strength to strength with Croatia. His goal last night, and his performance to go along with it, perhaps proves that his attacking talents are perhaps the major strengths of his game.
He certainly poses a better option than another target linked with the club.
On the other side of the pitch too, James Tavernier is one of Rangers main attacking outlets. Only Alfredo Morelos (40) has contributed more goals than Tavernier (31) for the side this season.
By getting these two athletic options to focus more on marauding runs than covering someone in front, it could free them to properly express themselves.
MORE RANGERS STORIES
So why has Gerrard moved away from the 3-5-2 formation? When the club tried it, the side used a back three of Connor Goldson, Nikola Katic and Jon Flanagan. It’s an unconventional defensive trio.
Not only would this system work better with three out and out centre-halves, but it would drastically improve the balance of the side.
And unleash our two flying wingbacks in the process.
